> If you're always providing API access through a proprietary library, > it doesn't matter if it's REST, SOAP, custom binary protocols, or whatnot. That was e

> If you're always providing API access through a proprietary library, > it doesn't matter if it's REST, SOAP, custom binary protocols, or whatnot. That was exactly my thought. I was looking for reinforcement of the possibility that people will still want the entire REST interface visible and documented even in the presence of wrapper libraries.