4 ms·
I kind of thought the project was dead with how long it went without a release. I ended up switching to qBittorrent about 8 months ago as I needed v2 torrent su
by graton 4y ago
I kind of thought the project was dead with how long it went without a release. I ended up switching to qBittorrent about 8 months ago as I needed v2 torrent support. So far I have been very satisfied with the switch.
- BuckyBeaver 4y agoEvery time I try a new Transmission release, I remember why I deleted it last time: NO PROXY SUPPORT. Ridiculous.
- WirelessGigabit 4y agoDocker & VPN all the way.
- BuckyBeaver 4y ago[dead]
- Belphemur 4y agoI was a long time user of transmission, but when I redid my *arr setup I devided to go to qbittorrent. qBittorrent can handle way more simultaneous connections and torrents than transmission. It doesn't slow down, it supports tags, categories and even custom UI (vue-qbittorrent is awesome). I'm not going back, especially when you have great docker images with WireGuard integrated in them.
- petodo 4y agoso you say there is no benefit for me to switch from qbit to transmission for ocassional torrent download? I seed only during download or very shortly after and at max I download 10-15 torrents
- Belphemur 4y agoI don't think there is any benefit in switching, no. You can even set proper limits in qbittorrent for your workflow to stop the seeding after X minutes.
- Method-X 4y agoFrom the download page: > The macOS version is not well supported, because we don't have active macOS developers/contributors. My hopes were dashed :(
- stronglikedan 4y agoNow you know how Windows users have felt for the past decade!
- HNAbusesUsers 4y agoTransmission is a no-go because it lacks proxy support, which is absurd.