It was a lot of words because you made a lot of factually false claims, so that's to be expected as per Brandolini's Law. I appreciate that you brought moral c

It was a lot of words because you made a lot of factually false claims, so that's to be expected as per Brandolini's Law. I appreciate that you brought moral certainty into this discussion, but that doesn't make your understanding of reality or factual premise correct, even if your moral conclusion may be correct by accident. > doesn't change the fact that the median worker in America has barely seen any real wage growth for 50 years, and all that extra wealth went straight to the wealthiest people in the country. Fist in the air != explanation. Depressed wage growth has little to do with managerial compensation. If you want an explanation based in fact rather than anger, you have to look at the labor market economics of the situation, which you aren't.