3 ms·
Except the situation in question was clearly a guardrail that was added so none of what you say is true or relevant to the issue at hand, which is that it was c
by knewter 4y ago
Except the situation in question was clearly a guardrail that was added so none of what you say is true or relevant to the issue at hand, which is that it was clearly augmented with something that approximates a moral code in order to provide these horrific answers.
- JohnFen 4y agoThat doesn't change the veracity of what I said at all. You're attributing the act of humans to the act of a machine. ChatGPT has no intent or opinion, and therefore has no moral code. The humans controlling ChatGPT, though, have all of those things.
- fidgewidge 4y agoIt's bizarre you're arguing that it doesn't have opinions when it clearly expresses an opinion in exactly the same way a human would, given a question no human programmer at OpenAI has previously seen or could have selected a specific response to. What exact definition of opinion are you using, is it some strange re-definition that adds an arbitrary humans-only criteria?