3 ms·

Please don't use unrelated posts to help peddle snake oil. https://attrition.org/errata/charlatan/steve_gibson/ https://attrition.org/errata/charlatan/steve_gib

• wnevets 4y ago
  Literally none of those links mention SQRL.
  • mike_d 4y ago
    They don't need to. He has been thoroughly and completely debunked for decades. Legitimate security researchers pay no attention to him, and neither should you.
    • wnevets 4y ago
      None of those links do that either.
    • KyeRussell 4y ago
      Would you talk to someone like this in real life? If you jumped into a conversation being this needlessly on the attack against someone who just posted a link to a project with the same name, I can’t imagine wanting to converse with you at all. How wrong or right you are about Steve Gibson is irrelevant. The fact that after a couple Id replies you can’t point to why this snake oil is snake oil is just the icing on the cake.
• ntdll 4y ago
  There's nothing snake oil about SQRL. Can you back up your claims?
• borplk 4y ago
  Disgusting comment. Steve Gibson is a true and independent professional with hundreds upon hundreds of hours of great and accurate video podcast content. Even when he makes a tiny mistake he comes back the next week and thoroughly corrects himself. That post is ancient and largely invalid. On top of that SQRL is in public domain with a published spec/algorithm. Stop punching the old man.