2 ms·
Right, that's what I thought, but wouldn't it be very short for chemistry? At least, to make any kind of chemical observation/experiment? Am I wrong? EDIT: Als
by gnulinux 4y ago
Right, that's what I thought, but wouldn't it be very short for chemistry? At least, to make any kind of chemical observation/experiment? Am I wrong?
EDIT: Also I think it's "microsecond" as opposed to "millisecond" right?
- dotancohen 4y agoMany chemicals exist for sub-second timeframes as part of a process. Look at photosynthesis for example. You'll commonly see it simplified to `6CO2 + 6H2O → C6H12O6 + 6O2` but actually, there are quite a few intermediary reactions and chemicals produced for short timeframes along the way.