2 ms·
No, it's exactly the opposite. Giving control of technology like this to only megacorporations and superpowers is a nakedly terrible outcome and advocates for i
by Miraste 4y ago
No, it's exactly the opposite. Giving control of technology like this to only megacorporations and superpowers is a nakedly terrible outcome and advocates for it should be given zero traction.
- dwohnitmok 4y agoI agree that's bad. What would you suggest to try to moderate the advancement of AI and make sure that AI capabilities don't outstrip AI safety?
- Miraste 4y agoFor current AI? I'd focus on open access research into exploits, behaviors, modifications, and unintended results, so the capabilities and failings of these models are fully understood. Safety tools along the lines of GPT detectors rather than ever-stricter censorship models. This is only possible to do properly with open development. As far as limits, restrictions, regulations... nothing. With current technology I think the "dangers" are mostly marketing and self-promotion. I have yet to see a concrete example based on actual capabilities that validates all the "weapon" comparisons. The current lines of development are promising for a number of applications, but they don't extrapolate towards AGI at all. The biggest real threat I see is the further destruction of middle-class jobs, for which... basic income? It's hard to say.