5 ms·
Hold up now you're switching the goalposts. Your original post suggested he was just a nobody, an idealistic (lefty? poor?) non-CEO penning angry screeds motiva
by smcl 4y ago
Hold up now you're switching the goalposts. Your original post suggested he was just a nobody, an idealistic (lefty? poor?) non-CEO penning angry screeds motivated by envy. Now that it turns out he's actually successful in his own right, you're now suggesting he's simply not equipped to talk about this - not part of the elite, untouchable few who are allowed comment on the goings-on in Silicon Valley?
Also just a heads-up: copy-pasting the first few words of someone's comment and formatting your reply around it looks really juvenile and petty.
- robomartin 4y ago> Your original post suggested he was just a nobody No, it did not. At all. My post had exactly nothing to do with the article’s author. Not one bit. > not part of the elite, untouchable few who are allowed comment on the goings-on in Silicon Valley Yet another misrepresentation. Please read what I actually wrote. > looks really juvenile and petty. That’s your interpretation. From my perspective it’s poetry in motion, a light-hearted intro to a reply rather than the offensive style you chose to assign to it. Take it easy. All in good fun.