3 ms·
> I wouldn't touch any kind of AR use case while driving. Seems ripe for lawsuits when you're obscuring a driver's view (especially with an eyepiece compared to
by com2kid 4y ago
> I wouldn't touch any kind of AR use case while driving. Seems ripe for lawsuits when you're obscuring a driver's view (especially with an eyepiece compared to putting a HUD on the windshield)
Cities, walking. :)
Walking around a city pulling out my phone to check directions is actively stupid, a HUD with arrows telling me what intersection to go down would improve safety on multiple fronts. (Theft and not situational awareness).
- malermeister 4y agoWould be nice for public transport, too, if indoors navigation works in some of the more complicated train/subway stations!
- com2kid 4y agoLooking at you, Japanese railway stations! Though honestly on vacation there, I enjoyed getting lost in Shinjuku station. :D Office complexes, finding someone's desk.
- kubanczyk 4y agoYes, teenagers would obviously use it responsibly and not overload the view with distractions. /s Also, there is an ongoing trend to ban mobiles for pedestrians crossing the streets (Honolulu, followed by Jiaxing, Lithuania, Poland, ...). It would be great if AR was regulated from the start to disappear in such semi-risky situations.