3 ms·
> Well, generally the team would still have an EM, just not that EM If there is an EM role, I don't see the problem. I took TFA to mean "become an EM who also
by the_af 4y ago
> Well, generally the team would still have an EM, just not that EM
If there is an EM role, I don't see the problem. I took TFA to mean "become an EM who also codes".
> What stops any IC doing that?
Nothing, but an IC has by definition time to tackle big problems. Also, other ICs are their peers. An EM+IC has no time to tackle big problems -- or if they do, then they are neglecting their management role -- and so by default will tend to focus on nitpicking or small tasks. Tasks that are best done by junior level ICs.
- rsynnott 4y ago> I took TFA to mean "become an EM who also codes". I don't _think_ that's what they're saying. I read it as "we have too many EMs; would some EMs like to un-EM, please?
- the_af 4y agoOh. In that case I misunderstood TFA. Wouldn't be the first time! In that case, I agree with you: no problem with an EM going back to an IC role.