4 ms·

https://dockerswarm.rocks/ https://dockerswarm.rocks/

• luckylion 4y ago
  > Whenever you read here "Docker Swarm" we are actually talking about "Docker Swarm mode". > Not the deprecated product called "Docker Swarm". "Hey, Bob, what can we do to confuse people?" - "I don't know... hey, did you hear about that Perl 6 thing? That worked pretty well!" I like it though, looks much more hands-on than the documentation which often feels just short of being useful.
  • sgt 4y ago
    They need a rebrand... maybe "Docker Flock". Users will flock to it and leave Nomad, k8s etc behind.
    • GordonS 4y ago
      That's a pretty cool name, I like it!
• jve 4y ago
  Is docker swarm alive and well? I always get the feeling it is something abandoned. But I love the simplicity.
  • raphinou 4y ago
    Docker Swarm is getting some more attention after having been neglected, with repo activity going up[1], and Mirantis even publishing a sponsored article on The Next Web[2]. Things look brighter for Swarm than one year ago. Interest in Docker Swarm also persist I think. My post on starting Docker Swarm in 2022 [3] on my very low profile blog gets very regular visits. [1]: https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master [2]: https://thenewstack.io/docker-swarm-a-user-friendly-alternative-to-kubernetes/ https://thenewstack.io/docker-swarm-a-user-friendly-alternat... [3]: https://www.yvesdennels.com/posts/docker-swarm-in-2022/ https://www.yvesdennels.com/posts/docker-swarm-in-2022/