3 ms·
Yeah, looks like a “poor man” docker swarm. And I would just go with swarm. It’s very good. And very easy to move to from compose. Too bad k8s won the hype batt
by szastamasta 4y ago
Yeah, looks like a “poor man” docker swarm. And I would just go with swarm. It’s very good. And very easy to move to from compose. Too bad k8s won the hype battle here.
- dawnerd 4y agoPeople get scared away from swarm because they make it sound like you NEED 3 managers minimum. This simply isn't true and it runs great even on a single node. I've moved all of my production and stage environments to be swarm based. I just wished there was an easier way to have file-shares between nodes. Makes running a reverse proxy like traefik tricky.
- ancieque 4y agoYou may like the new release of moby 23.0.0 then :) see https://docs.docker.com/engine/release-notes/23.0/ https://docs.docker.com/engine/release-notes/23.0/ the community is working on adding Swarm support to CSI vendors: https://github.com/olljanat/csi-plugins-for-docker-swarm https://github.com/olljanat/csi-plugins-for-docker-swarm
- moqmar 4y agoTBH, to me Swarm always feels like something way more complex than Compose, but also way less flexible than Kubernetes. For most people, I guess they either want simplicity, or a full flexible cluster with a great ecosystem.