I don't; I've been a developer since 1999. Those who have remained employed through the same downturns know this as well. However, there are plenty of developer

I don't; I've been a developer since 1999. Those who have remained employed through the same downturns know this as well. However, there are plenty of developers whose jobs consist of 90-95% of work that a remote resource could easily do, and that 5-10% could be turned over to a short-term contractor (or consolidated). If a company saves 75%, 50% inefficiency is still a net positive. Hint: if someone describe themselves as "{some single language} Developer", they should always be concerned. Doubly so if they came out of a cookie cutter bootcamp.