3 ms·
Unfortunately, I have to agree that it's not very effective. Even using it on Wikipedia articles, on which it has likely been trained, doesn't yield impressive
by SickAnimations 15y ago
Unfortunately, I have to agree that it's not very effective. Even using it on Wikipedia articles, on which it has likely been trained, doesn't yield impressive results. It would be more interesting if it worked well.
- nl 15y agoI use an enhanced version of the summarizer from Classifier4J (mentioned elsewhere in this thread) for http://demo.qontex.com/ http://demo.qontex.com/. There is no public API to show the summaries, but if you can find a Wikipedia page it doesn't generate reasonable ads for I'd be very interested. Eg random pages from today's front page: http://demo.qontex.com/?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Gang http://demo.qontex.com/?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre... http://demo.qontex.com/?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China http://demo.qontex.com/?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rep... http://demo.qontex.com/?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_comedy http://demo.qontex.com/?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bri...