4 ms·
I didn't do my job as CEO to keep the company sufficiently profitable, so you must be fired instead of me.
by SeanLuke 4y ago
I didn't do my job as CEO to keep the company sufficiently profitable, so you must be fired instead of me.
- qup 4y agoMore like 'as CEO, firing you to keep the company sufficiently profitable is my job.'
- p1esk 4y agoHe cut his salary by 98%, but it’s most likely refers to the base salary, while most of his total comp is in stock.
- Frost1x 4y agoTo be completely fair, it is one of those situations where the damage is done and layoffs are probably one of the best options for the company from a completely financial point of view. He messed up and as such, there are consequences. With that said, seems like admittance of this level of error at a leadership level should be grounds to lose your job and be replaced, so the CEO should also be replaced in this process. I realize there are stability issues where you need to bring someone else in and catch them up to speed before doing this since the role likely requires a lot of contextual awareness but none the less, that process should be (but almost certainly isn't) underway at most these organizations. If anyone not in the c-suite made these levels of errors and clearly admitted to them, they'd be gone yesterday.
- deltree7 4y agoThe employees can actually go build their own company and make their own poor decisions. The amount of entitlement among HNers is mind-boggling. Newsflash: I fired my grass-cutter and snow-remover this year. According to the dumb logic presented on all social media, I should have fired myself for not seeing inflation and having to cut costs on a few things.
- SeanLuke 4y agoWait, you actually think CEOs own their companies? The CEO is an employee like any other. He was hired to do a specific job. He didn't do it. He should be the first to be fired.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]