It's just PR, and/or some internal stunt by the eng team for better performance reviews. Both of which are fine, if the article itself is actually useful. In th

It's just PR, and/or some internal stunt by the eng team for better performance reviews. Both of which are fine, if the article itself is actually useful. In this case, I feel like the only thing that could have been interesting is the dyld workaround, but they don't go into depth with that at all. The first two "solutions" feel like they were just doing it inefficiently in the first place, rather than some novel technique worth sharing