3 ms·

So the guy who corrected the function documentation and submitted one line patch changing "it's" to "its" (a common English mistake) is now "Bitcoin"? Also the

So the guy who corrected the function documentation and submitted one line patch changing "it's" to "its" (a common English mistake) is now "Bitcoin"? Also the claim you are asserting is laughably false. There is no magic button the developers have that can just force everyone to run their software.

pdonis 4y ago
> the claim you are asserting is laughably false. I'm not the one asserting the claim: the plaintiff is. As I have already said, if that claim is false, the plaintiff's case collapses, since that claim, according to the appeals court, is the "essence" of the plaintiff's case.
- nullc 4y ago
  The challenge there is how many millions of dollars is it fair to cost an volunteer open source developer to take such a thing to trial in order to establish a principle for a foreign countries laws? 3 million dollars? 2 million dollars?