Without citing its sources chatGPT, Bard and others will quickly accumulate a lot of law suites because of copyright and content violations. Just think about w

Without citing its sources chatGPT, Bard and others will quickly accumulate a lot of law suites because of copyright and content violations. Just think about what happened with Google News in Europe: Google needs to license its content: https://blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/google-licenses-content-from-news-publishers-under-the-eu-copyright-directive/ https://blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/google-li... And with citing its sources an AI search answer is basically like an individualised Wikipedia article for your question. That is not much different from the list of search results, now. Except there will be more text in between the links. This will make it more difficult to influence the ranking of the cited search results by means of SEO. This is because like in a Wikipedia article the order of the citations depends more on the order of the content of the article, not so much on the relevance of the citation for the article as a whole. So I think these new AI search engines will not be so much a "Google killer", but they will be more a "SEO killer".