5 ms·

> AIs with an 's', it's not a single entity, it's multiple completely unrelated tools, of course if you put them under the same individual "AI" name it seems am

> AIs with an 's', it's not a single entity, it's multiple completely unrelated tools, of course if you put them under the same individual "AI" name it seems amazing What a bizarre, nonsensical argument. By that logic, the current state of a technology could not legitimately be considered "amazing" if any subset of it is not "amazing". Utter nonsense. Regardless, I didn't even claim it was "amazing". That's your introduction. What I claimed was that current AI technology passes tests that assess whether or not it is "intelligence". In AI, that's the de facto paradigm shift.

lm28469 4y ago
> current AI technology passes tests that assess whether or not it is "intelligence". An "ai" also passed the Turing test in 2014, nothing happened, the world is still the same, we still orbit the sun, water is still wet, no paradigm shift. What tests are you referencing ? How do they prove intelligence ? Where is the paradigm shift ? do you know what a paradigm shift is ? If there was an AI paradigm shift it happened already, more than a decade ago: https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic582 https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic5... what happened since is incremental progress