If an economist wrong an article that's title was "the usd is stable", he would either need to show that, or it would be a rather pointless article wouldn't it?

If an economist wrong an article that's title was "the usd is stable", he would either need to show that, or it would be a rather pointless article wouldn't it? Similarly, an article whose title and whole content is just "Crypto Is All a Scam" should probably actually contain something more than "because we all agree, don't ask questions"... And if such an economist were challenged on whether the USD is stable, he would presumably be able to cite decades of data of inflation rates, FX etc. It would be a bit crazy to write a whole article about one thing, but say nothing because the thing is obvious and widely accepted (so why write it)... Plus, "Crypto Is All a Scam" is the claim here. So if people making claims are the ones obliged to support them then... As I say elsewhere, I am not some crypto evangelist. I am just tired of both sides being so vacuous and relying on prejudice and publishing such poor materials...