> Nobody is saying it needs to be defended. That’s something you’re implying that I never said. Fair. I apologize for being presumptuous. > I just said that

> Nobody is saying it needs to be defended. That’s something you’re implying that I never said. Fair. I apologize for being presumptuous. > I just said that it’s not a constructively critical view, it’s just a rant. Sure, but the rant is useful because it provides the context of Samsung sucking at the same thing consistently for years on end. You're right that it's not self-contained and if you were looking for that in the article you'd be disappointed. But at some point it just seems repetitive to have to explain things that have already been repeated for years. Like I don't really want to spend hours (not exaggerating as I've done it before) explaining why I hate cops every time I say so - most people are already well aware of the controversy surrounding cops and don't require an explanation even if they disagree. Anyway, I guess we just see it differently. Cheers.