3 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Illusion "In The Great Illusion, Angell's primary thesis was, in the w
by moose_man 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Illusion
"In The Great Illusion, Angell's primary thesis was, in the words of historian James Joll, that "the economic cost of war was so great that no one could possibly hope to gain by starting a war the consequences of which would be so disastrous."[4] For that reason, a general European war was very unlikely to start, and if it did, it would not last long.[5] He argued that war was economically and socially irrational[6] and that war between industrial countries was futile because conquest did not pay. J. D. B. Miller writes: "The 'Great Illusion' was that nations gained by armed confrontation, militarism, war, or conquest."[7]
This book was published in 1909, it was wildly popular.
- UncleOxidant 4y agoCould anything other than China invading Taiwan precipitate war between the US and China? I doubt it (though sure, 'accidents' could happen given the current level of bellicosity). However, if China does invade Taiwan the whole economic argument seems to go off the table from the US perspective because Taiwan's fabs crank out the majority of the world's most advanced chips - ie. that act of invading Taiwan would in itself do a lot of damage to the world economy were it to happen within the next couple of years (before other fabs currently under construction come on line in 2 or 3 years). But then again, China has to know the stakes and the response (both economic and military) that would come to bear against them should they invade Taiwan.
- moose_man 4y agoIn a crisis spiral into war, I think the last thing that will be considered are chips or economics. It's often emotion that pushes everything over the edge. It's not a logical process. Nationalism is a force that operates on its own set of rules.