> before every single-sex space for women no longer exists. This is a completely imagined problem. I don't want to outright accuse you of intentionally lying,

> before every single-sex space for women no longer exists. This is a completely imagined problem. I don't want to outright accuse you of intentionally lying, because your writing comes off as more just severely uninformed. But where on earth do you come up with this opinion? > If you're a actual female woman though, > it's probably best to put some effort in to stopping these changes You're mistaking sex & gender here. They are indeed quite separate concepts. Perhaps this is why you're apparently resistant to accepting trans people as the gender they present themselves as? I want to be clear -- the changes are about accepting trans people in society. This does go hand-in-hand with reducing violence against trans people. If there's no acceptance, then the ones that hold the most extreme antagonizing viewpoints _do_ use violence. [1] Using language that others trans people, casts them out as not-women, dehumanizes them. When you dehumanize a person, you make it possible to objectify them. And when people are objects, people become ok with violence. You cannot ignore the reality that there exists not only people with body dysmorphia, but also folks that don't fall neatly into the XY or XX chromosome paradigm [2]. Nature, reality, does not fall into neat little ordered boxes. Everyone deserves a fair shake. And everyone deserves to be free of violence and legal discrimination for them simply existing. [1] https://www.hrc.org/resources/a-national-epidemic-fatal-anti-transgender-violence-in-america-in-2018 https://www.hrc.org/resources/a-national-epidemic-fatal-anti... [2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9396296/#:~:text=Classical%20disorders%20of%20sex%20chromosome,disorders%20have%20abnormal%20sex%20chromosome https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9396296/#:~:text=Classical%2....