5 ms·

> We have a long way to go Well maybe we would. But, we're not doing this alone. We could move the goalposts again but AI already passed the tests we made for

> We have a long way to go Well maybe we would. But, we're not doing this alone. We could move the goalposts again but AI already passed the tests we made for it. This paradigm shift's happened already; present AI is passing undetected versus a human in a rapidly growing list of highly skilled and specialised tasks. When the list comes to contain "improving AI" it's game over.

lm28469 4y ago
> present AI is passing AIs with an 's', it's not a single entity, it's multiple completely unrelated tools, of course if you put them under the same individual "AI" name it seems amazing, that's what medias and non tech people do The problem is that there is still no intelligence, hence no paradigm shift, just like a hammer and a screw driver won't build a house, even if you have ten of them, and even if they're very fancy ones Read what people said about "AI" when it learned to play chess, it sounds exactly like a lot of comments on GPT today > present AI is passing undetected versus a human in a rapidly growing list of highly skilled and specialised tasks. I've also witnessed the opposite, people start questioning generic art and mediocre articles, asking if they're AI generated
- detrites 4y ago
  > AIs with an 's', it's not a single entity, it's multiple completely unrelated tools, of course if you put them under the same individual "AI" name it seems amazing What a bizarre, nonsensical argument. By that logic, the current state of a technology could not legitimately be considered "amazing" if any subset of it is not "amazing". Utter nonsense. Regardless, I didn't even claim it was "amazing". That's your introduction. What I claimed was that current AI technology passes tests that assess whether or not it is "intelligence". In AI, that's the de facto paradigm shift.
  - lm28469 4y ago
    > current AI technology passes tests that assess whether or not it is "intelligence". An "ai" also passed the Turing test in 2014, nothing happened, the world is still the same, we still orbit the sun, water is still wet, no paradigm shift. What tests are you referencing ? How do they prove intelligence ? Where is the paradigm shift ? do you know what a paradigm shift is ? If there was an AI paradigm shift it happened already, more than a decade ago: https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic582 https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic5... what happened since is incremental progress

lm28469 4y ago

> present AI is passing AIs with an 's', it's not a single entity, it's multiple completely unrelated tools, of course if you put them under the same individual "AI" name it seems amazing, that's what medias and non tech people do The problem is that there is still no intelligence, hence no paradigm shift, just like a hammer and a screw driver won't build a house, even if you have ten of them, and even if they're very fancy ones Read what people said about "AI" when it learned to play chess, it sounds exactly like a lot of comments on GPT today > present AI is passing undetected versus a human in a rapidly growing list of highly skilled and specialised tasks. I've also witnessed the opposite, people start questioning generic art and mediocre articles, asking if they're AI generated

detrites 4y ago
> AIs with an 's', it's not a single entity, it's multiple completely unrelated tools, of course if you put them under the same individual "AI" name it seems amazing What a bizarre, nonsensical argument. By that logic, the current state of a technology could not legitimately be considered "amazing" if any subset of it is not "amazing". Utter nonsense. Regardless, I didn't even claim it was "amazing". That's your introduction. What I claimed was that current AI technology passes tests that assess whether or not it is "intelligence". In AI, that's the de facto paradigm shift.
- lm28469 4y ago
  > current AI technology passes tests that assess whether or not it is "intelligence". An "ai" also passed the Turing test in 2014, nothing happened, the world is still the same, we still orbit the sun, water is still wet, no paradigm shift. What tests are you referencing ? How do they prove intelligence ? Where is the paradigm shift ? do you know what a paradigm shift is ? If there was an AI paradigm shift it happened already, more than a decade ago: https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic582 https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic5... what happened since is incremental progress