>> I do agree, though it feels like ChatGPT, for instance, already has a lot of potential to harm. Absolutely, but that is because it hasn't "advanced" as much

>> I do agree, though it feels like ChatGPT, for instance, already has a lot of potential to harm. Absolutely, but that is because it hasn't "advanced" as much as some people seem to think. Others seem to see the problems but they seem to hope or believe that they will all go away as those systems "advance" (or "improve" or "progress") further, when they may as well just have reached a dead end after which they can only become bigger and more bloated as time goes by, and still be dumb as bricks, and the only thing that will "advance" is their ability to cause chaos and make a mess. I like this quote by Pedro Domingos: >> People worry that computers will get too smart and take over the world, but the real problem is that they’re too stupid and they’ve already taken over the world. https://www.washington.edu/news/2015/09/17/a-q-a-with-pedro-domingos-author-of-the-master-algorithm/ https://www.washington.edu/news/2015/09/17/a-q-a-with-pedro-...