5 ms·
Sounds like a good way to counter this sort of weapon would be to have human shields. I'm not sure if that's an improvement on the situation if they start to a
by TomGullen 15y ago
Sounds like a good way to counter this sort of weapon would be to have human shields. I'm not sure if that's an improvement on the situation if they start to adopt those sort of tactics.
Enemies will simply adapt to new weapons they face. Much like a bucket of paint would be quite effective against and remote control mini tank.
Whilst the engineering feat is impressive, it is still important to note that at the receiving end of such ingenuity is a writhing half dead corpse so it is with hesitation I would ever celebrate such innovation.
- coldarchon 15y agoJust have look at the Wunderwaffen of the Nazis in WW2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_X http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_X http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheintochter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheintochter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav Did it change anything when the Russians let 13.500.000 of their soldiers die while for every 3 of them there was someone with a gun at the back of their head to make sure they wouldn't flee? The T-34 was the most successful tank in WW2, but his gun couldn't even hurt the Tiger tanks. Advanced technology will only help on commando operations, not in a war.