Search is a fascinating topic because it's such a fundamental problem and every search engine is based around the same extremely simple data structure (Posting

Search is a fascinating topic because it's such a fundamental problem and every search engine is based around the same extremely simple data structure (Posting list/inverted index). Despite that, search isn't easy and every search engine seems to be quite unique. It also seems to get exponentially harder with scale. You can write your own search engine that will perform very well on a surprisingly large amount of data, even doing naive full-text search. A search tool I came across a while back is a great example of something at that scale: https://pagefind.app/ https://pagefind.app/. For anyone who doesn't know anything about search I highly recommend reading this (It's mentioned in the blog post as well): https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp4.html https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp4.html. Algolia also has a series of blog posts describing how their search engine works: https://www.algolia.com/blog/engineering/inside-the-algolia-engine-part-1-indexing-vs-search/ https://www.algolia.com/blog/engineering/inside-the-algolia-.... --- It's interesting that GitHub seems to have quite a few shards. Algolia basically has a monolithic architecture with 3 different hosts which replicate data and they embed their search engine in Nginx: "Our search engine is a C++ module which is directly embedded inside Nginx. So when the query enters Nginx, we directly run it through the search engine and send it back to the client." I'm guessing GitHub probably doesn't store repos in a custom binary format like Algolia does though: "Each index is a binary file in our own format. We put the information in a specific order so that it is very fast to perform queries on it." "Our Nginx C++ module will directly open the index file in memory-mapped mode in order to share memory between the different Nginx processes and will apply the query on the memory-mapped data structure." https://stackshare.io/posts/how-algolia-built-their-realtime-search-as-a-service-product https://stackshare.io/posts/how-algolia-built-their-realtime... 100ms p99 seems pretty good, but I'm curious what the p50 is and how much time is spent searching vs ranking. I've seen Dan Luu say that majority of time should be spent ranking rather than searching and when I've snooped on https://hn.algolia.com https://hn.algolia.com I've seen single digit millisecond search times in the responses, which seems to corroborate this. I'm curious why they chose to optimize ingestion when it only took 36hrs to re-index the entire corpus without optimizations. A 50% speedup is nice, but 36hrs and 18hrs are the same order of magnitude and it sounds like there was a fair amount of engineering effort put into this. An index 1/5 of the size is pretty sweet though, I have to assume that's a bigger win that 50% faster ingestion. Since they're indexing by language I wonder if they have custom indexing/searching for each language, or if their ngram strategy is generic over all languages. Perhaps their "sparse grams" naturally token different for every language. Hard to tell when they leave out the juiciest part of the strategy though: "Assume you have some function that given a bigram gives a weight". Search is so cool. I could talk about it all day.