3 ms·
> For those curious, I wouldn’t actually recommend trying Linux on an older machine unless you’re willing to custom compile your system, I do a lot of retro com
by guenthert 4y ago
> For those curious, I wouldn’t actually recommend trying Linux on an older machine unless you’re willing to custom compile your system, I do a lot of retro computing, and modern Linux is just kind of big.
I don't follow. Win2K is ok on older machines, but for Linux it must be a 'modern' one? I can assure you that a Linux distribution of the Win2K era will run at least as efficiently on such hardware as Win2K. I wouldn't necessarily recommend going on-line with either though.
If one absolutely must run current software on museum-piece hardware, then I'd recommend NetBSD for which time moves much more slowly than Linux.
- Shared404 4y ago> then I'd recommend NetBSD for which time moves much more slowly than Linux. I've personally had success with Arch/Alpine/Void style distro's and a window manager. Modern Linux doesn't have to be big.