> Yes, they all egregiously failed. A massive, widespread, collective failure for which they should lose their jobs, as many other people do. I am all for thou

> Yes, they all egregiously failed. A massive, widespread, collective failure for which they should lose their jobs, as many other people do. I am all for thoughtful discussions on how tech CEOs could be held responsible outside of empty mea culpas in blog posts, but "they should lose their jobs" feels like cutting off the nose to spite the face. Does ousting a CEO really help the company, or the workers who didn't get laid off? And where does the line get drawn? % of layoffs or absolute number of layoffs? How does the absolute size of a company get factored in?