3 ms·
I thought what they meant was just "you are laid off not because you had performed poorly". Of course, it is still the CEO's decision to over-hire, but the par
by RyEgswuCsn 4y ago
I thought what they meant was just "you are laid off not because you had performed poorly". Of course, it is still the CEO's decision to over-hire, but the parent suggested that over-hiring was not CEO's fault either, but a necessary move to capture the additional growth.
- sharemywin 4y agoAgain it's the statement like they some how lost something. Now if they hired those people by saying "well he hire for the quarter so you know bad quarter your probably gone." No they made big statements about how they hire for the long term.