4 ms·
There is a certain irony to decrying attacks on trans ideology dogma as "fascism" while defending censorship. It is not through silence and imposition that hea
by Levitz 4y ago
There is a certain irony to decrying attacks on trans ideology dogma as "fascism" while defending censorship.
It is not through silence and imposition that healthy social order changes. Demands are made while little public discourse has even taken place and the more friction that creates the more those demanding feel vindicated, the more rejection fosters.
It seems like rather than changing hearts, the trans movement decided it was in the right and set itself to impart justice, whether the public understands it or not. Not quite fascistic, definitely totalitarian, that makes it way closer to actual fascism than anything that is often pointed as such though. Shame.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- PartiallyTyped 4y agoTotalitarian refers to a single party controlling the government. I didnt support censorship either. You created a strawman that i couldnt respond due to the sheer volume of downvotes. I support people expressing their thoughts freely so that I know who is dangerous, and who is not. Who has a disdain for my mere existence, and who is willing to stand in support of minorities. The reality is that bigots will only get emboldened, as they have, and it’s not due to censorship, it’s due to strawmans and falsehoods pushed by prominent bigots. I merely pointed to bigots killing people, and to prominent politicians who embolden the bigots, and rally them under a false flag, under a supposedly “holy” cause, under the so-called protection of conservative values. Shame on you, for jumping to conclusions and creating strawmans.