4 ms·
Yes because you are treating a sequence of words the same as a pseudorandom generator. The former has a probability distribution of sequences reflective of the
by PartiallyTyped 4y ago
Yes because you are treating a sequence of words the same as a pseudorandom generator.
The former has a probability distribution of sequences reflective of the dataset and context whereas the latter is pure random chance assuming input seed is random.
- causi 4y agoIt's just a program, though. It has no bigotry. You don't punish a machine, you correct it.
- mcronce 4y agoThis ban doesn't punish the machine; it doesn't care whether or not it's banned from Twitch. It does two things: * Makes sure the people controlling the machine are incentivized to correct it (not that I think they needed it, but what I think is irrelevant) * Ensures that content that Twitch management doesn't want on their platform, and which is in violation of their TOS, is removed immediately, regardless of the thoughts/actions of the people controlling the machine.
- DanHulton 4y agoYeah, but you also don't necessarily allow it to continue to broadcast while exhibiting errant behaviour. Your interpretation of this as a "punishment" of the machine isn't necessarily correct, nor the only perspective that's ultimately important here. As far as Twitch is concerned, there's a channel that's breaking TOS, repeatedly. They're not "punishing" the owner of that channel, they're just enforcing the TOS, something the channel owner agreed to when creating their channel.
- flangola7 4y agoOpenAI (which powers this Seinfeld generator) is putting significant resources into preventing it from creating unsafe and antisocial material. Until that is prefected, outside entities like Twitch can use traditional moderation tools, such as the 14 day ban issued in this case.