Yes but also no. They should be held responsible for the results of their actions. But current firings might not be the result of their actions. So putting b

Yes but also no. They should be held responsible for the results of their actions. But current firings might not be the result of their actions. So putting boni (which often are a major part of their sallery) in a trust to be payed out years later and which act similar to a security deposit would be a rough idea for a direction this can take. But I think the main problem are not CEOs but how the current form of the stock/investment marked is _extremely_ hotly to long term sustainable company management. Stock holders are not seldom the main drive for bad CEO decisions due to a combination of which CEO and how they pressure the CEO (or what they tolerate). It not rare to see major stock holders push knowingly for long term devastating decisions because they short term yield high dividends and stock spikes and when things come crashing down they don't hold the stock anymore (quasi/oversimplified, to avoid consequences they might use all kinds of tricks to make it look different).