> Although it actually seems less like ... My experience with talking to chatbots has been essentially that the responses are completely open ended and can be

> Although it actually seems less like ... My experience with talking to chatbots has been essentially that the responses are completely open ended and can be taken to mean literally anything you could conceivably infer, and if you continue the conversation as such the chatbot will 100% double down on whatever you assumed. the same prompts and the same context will lead to completely different outcomes based on how the human user responds next. Everything is both a joke and not, both a lie and an honest mistake, everything and nothing at the same time because it's not logical in the first place. I've noticed users of stable diffusion/image generating AI's don't seem to have any trouble confusing the output for something logical, but with things like ChatGPT it seems like an almost universal fallacy.