3 ms·
While I commiserate with your weariness, I have a different reaction by looking at the technology stack in layers. The lower layers do need to be stable and I
by michael_daconta 4y ago
While I commiserate with your weariness, I have a different reaction by looking at the technology stack in layers. The lower layers do need to be stable and I believe the evolution of those layers has slowed down (for example, operating systems, network stacks, web protocols, etc.). Of course, the higher layers are still rapidly evolving (web UI, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity) but that is because as an industry we have not settled on the "winners" in those areas. So, rapid progress and trial-by-error is necessary to determine the best solutions in the higher layers of the technology stack. I think that frenzied search for the best solutions and its ensuing messiness is because "Software has eaten the World" and that the opportunities for both riches and global impact are still there. In the end, that is a good thing.
- JohnFen 4y ago> In the end, that is a good thing. As a user who just wants to use my computer to do stuff, I think it's a terrible thing. But your explanation does make sense, and validates my stance of avoiding the use of new software to the greatest degree feasible. I'd much rather not have the latest gee-whiz stuff and have stuff that just works well.