3 ms·
Agree, there clearly exceptions, though issue is that each of those situations either has a reasonable resolution or that lack of diversity just postpones cultu
by O__________O 4y ago
Agree, there clearly exceptions, though issue is that each of those situations either has a reasonable resolution or that lack of diversity just postpones cultural conflicts among cultures. Basically, if lack of inclusion issue for significant subset of a population, then it’s an issue. If there two cultures that are naturally wholly independent of each other, attempting inject diversity is clearly flawed. On the flip side, unable non-statistically significant diversity would lead to a chaotic state. Basically, there’s no optimal state, but a diverse system will always outperform a heterogeneous or chaotic system on average, only edge cases that are the exception.
- abduhl 4y ago>>Basically, there’s no optimal state, but a diverse system will always outperform a heterogeneous or chaotic system on average, only edge cases that are the exception. China’s rise as a superpower would seem to directly contradict your statement. It seems like the truth is the opposite of what you say: a heterogenous system will always outperform a diverse/chaotic system unless there are edge cases which introduce shocks to the system.
- O__________O 4y agoChina is only heterogeneous in name, it’s not in practice. Case in point, China’s response to Covid over time, both at the national level and on a case by case basis. The are no global systems of governance that are wildly adhered to which are actually literal forms of anarchy; anarchy being the common description on a chaotic system of governance.