4 ms·
Right, absolutely fair comment. I would also add however that people don't realize how much of our understanding of physics needs to be broken for these objects
by bostonwalker 4y ago
Right, absolutely fair comment. I would also add however that people don't realize how much of our understanding of physics needs to be broken for these objects to have a terrestrial technological origin.
Consider the following aspects of the observed phenomena:
- Intelligent characteristics (chasing / following / loitering behaviour)
- Ability to generate and withstand extreme G-forces
- Ability to expend/sustain extreme bursts of energy
- Lack of visible exhaust
- Bizarre aerodynamic characteristics
I'm not an aerospace engineer, but I am a technologist and I took some aerospace-related courses in university. The first two aspects combined seem to rule out control by a human in the cockpit, and given the history of AI I would say autonomous control by a computer as well. Although not altogether the possibility of remote control by a human.
But the last three aspects transcend not only everything I think I know about existing technology, but also my understanding of:
- Newton's Third Law of motion and the rocket equation
- Fluid mechanics/Navier-Stokes equation
- Thermodynamics
i.e., it exceeds our current science by such an enormous margin that I couldn't even begin to approach how to analyze it. Therefore, I think that if we rule out the possibility of a delusion/hoax, it's far more likely that these objects are alien than a secret skunk works project.