Well for me atleast it is magic. I understand roughly how it is supposed to work, but the output is too good based on that. Not in a million years does it feel

Well for me atleast it is magic. I understand roughly how it is supposed to work, but the output is too good based on that. Not in a million years does it feel ready for serious tasks though. If I use reporters as proxy for layman. This has sparked countless news paper articles and majority of them I feel spend alot of time going through the caveats with the limits. Mostly the lack of logic and hallucinations. My naive view is that people can judge the chat system using their interpersonal skills and actually get a feel of flakiness of the AI better than reading statistics on the subject.