3 ms·

UNC and Harvard both argued before the Supreme Court in 2022 that their anti-Asian racism is for “diversity”. A lot of people are dishonest about that, but the

UNC and Harvard both argued before the Supreme Court in 2022 that their anti-Asian racism is for “diversity”. A lot of people are dishonest about that, but the people who crow about “diversity” consistently engage in racialized language — and discrimination based on race, such as discrimination against Asians at those universities. (You can see GP works himself around to the racial angle by the end.) I didn’t put any words in GPs mouth: I pointed out he’s using the language of modern bigots, such as those at Harvard and UNC.

makeitdouble 4y ago
You are commenting on a case that is still open, and while you seem squarely in favor of SFFA, their claims are far from being validated (they’ve been rejected by lower courts up to this point) What I find interesting in particular from those lawsuits: one of the main argument was the representation of Asians being lower than “white” ethnic groups adjusted for selected academic achievements. That basically goes against your thesis, as doing that intentionally would lower diversity.