4 ms·
That’s my point - some people want[0] to work in-person and some want to work remotely. There are plenty of jobs and places for each, but trying to mix them to
by marcus0x62 4y ago
That’s my point - some people want[0] to work in-person and some want to work remotely. There are plenty of jobs and places for each, but trying to mix them together on a single team is never going to work. So don’t try. Setup your team to be unapologetically in-person, with all the baggage that entails: loss of commute time, lack of ability to recruit geographically distant workers, possibly more streamlined real-time collaboration, etc. or setup your team to be remote with all the baggage that entails: lower overhead, hire the best talent anywhere in the world, better focus on deep work/asynchronous communication, probably weaker team bonds, inability to just get in a room and figure something out quickly, etc.
0 - alternately, “are more productive working”
- oaiey 4y agoGreefield / New Formed Teams: I agree 100%. Was not that the Stripe Engineering story before Pandemia. Two remote divisions and one in office? But brownfield with an existing organization: That does not work. What if you have a team with two key people. One who only wants to work remote and one who does not. Then you have a multi-month knowledge transformation ahead if you, if possible at all.