3 ms·
Nah, it’s not. Not at all. You’re asking a portion of the population that thrives on socialization to avoid that for the majority of the day. That is just as b
by einherjae 4y ago
Nah, it’s not. Not at all.
You’re asking a portion of the population that thrives on socialization to avoid that for the majority of the day. That is just as bad as insisting on forcing that on the introverts.
- Volundr 4y agoNo one is asking that. They are asking that they not be dragged into the office in order to fill someone else's need for socializing at the expense of their own we'll being. If other people want to work at the office more power too them, but if not enough people want an to be in the office to fill their need for socializing, they are being asked to find it elsewhere instead of trying to force everyone else to fill their needs.
- einherjae 4y agoI don’t think you appreciate how bad full remote work can be for someone that thrives on having people around them. But I do appreciate the point you make here, asking others to do something they don’t appreciate just because you want to have people around, is not really a viable solution either. Then again, humans are intrinsically social animals. And communication does work better for some purposes when done in person. The point I’m trying to raise is that there should exist a decent middle ground that lets introverts and extroverts thrive in the same companies. Possibly by asking both to give a bit. But that point is somewhat incompatible with the “full remote is the way”-stance that seems to be very popular in at least a vocal part of crowds like HN.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]