> acting from their deepest beliefs and convictions And because the author disagrees with those beliefs, they're not worthy of engaging, but are "disinformatio

> acting from their deepest beliefs and convictions And because the author disagrees with those beliefs, they're not worthy of engaging, but are "disinformation." Thus the discussion is not "can a more correct path be found between these two beliefs," but "how can those that disagree with me be removed from the conversation."