That article is attempting to discredit the first paper the scientists put out by saying it’s most likely artillery from fighting. The link I posted is the fol

That article is attempting to discredit the first paper the scientists put out by saying it’s most likely artillery from fighting. The link I posted is the follow up paper by the same scientists rebuking the discredit. It contains more evidence from a longer timeline (dating back to 2018) and this new paper includes photos they captured of the flight path of the objects. This paper still needs to be peer reviewed but it’s very interesting nonetheless