3 ms·
Can I see how you got that Uranium figure? Because raw Uranium doesn't need that sort of treatment (it's not radioactive enough) and I'm struggling to believe 2
by concordDance 4y ago
Can I see how you got that Uranium figure? Because raw Uranium doesn't need that sort of treatment (it's not radioactive enough) and I'm struggling to believe 2kg of refined Uranium is needed per person per year to meetb3% of energy need.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoDU is still a toxic heavy metal, and the 3-15% by mass (or 100% in a HWR) that becomes SNF needs containment that outmasses it by at least an order of magnitude. Then there's another order of magnitude more LLW again. > to meet 3% of energy need This is disingenuous because the proposition is to expand it to make a relevant contribution to decarbonization.