5 ms·

Check out the debunk of the debunk :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBt4CNHyAck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBt4CNHyAck

• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• bananabiscuit 4y ago
  Also the debunk of the debunk of the debunk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT1uRf5_dF4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fT1uRf5_dF4
  • mbfg 4y ago
    Curious, what does a debunk-turtle look like?
• crubier 4y ago
  What a poor debunk of the debunk. I had respect for David Fravor but listening an ex F/A-18 pilot say confidently "There is 0% chance that I'm wrong" and keeping using argument from authority convinced me that he's just wrong.
  • ikrenji 4y ago
    well he literally saw the object with his own eyes. do we have a debunk for fravors mark 1 eyeball sensor?
    • crubier 4y ago
      Maybe listen to the videos? Do you think human vision is something that is absolutely 100% foolproof? Why are there thousands of known optical illusions examples? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_optical_illusions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_optical_illusions Have you heard of spatial disorientation? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_disorientation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_disorientation Do you think the human eye stereo baseline is large enough to determine the depth of objects more than 15m away?
      • ikrenji 4y ago
        so any reported anomaly should be discarded as an optical illusion?
        • crubier 4y ago
          Not any no. But the 2 cases that he is describing definitely sound like the perfect description of an optical illusion / situational awareness tunneling effect.
          • Sightline 4y ago
            Make a bokeh in the shape of a tic-tac.
      • Sightline 4y ago
        So his F-18 radar was lying. His eyes were lying. His wingman's eyes were lying. And the ship 30 miles away that picked it up on radar was also lying. Interesting conclusion.
• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]