It's true that only really perpetual motion machines are banned. However, the patent is supposed to teach enough (to one skilled in the art) to be enabling. If

It's true that only really perpetual motion machines are banned. However, the patent is supposed to teach enough (to one skilled in the art) to be enabling. If the patents specification (not the abstract or claims) are not enabling then it is not valid... and ostensibly the examiner should have rejected it. Now just take a bunch of this kind of gibberish along with the full patent database and feed it into a transformer based LLM to generate reams of patent like objects with negative pressure polarized vacuums of inverted space time in order to achieve inertial mass reduction.