4 ms·
If you have the skill to physically mimic my art, I see no problem. I am not a huge fan of copyright. AI does not have the physical skill to make art. It is ent
by ForestCritter 4y ago
If you have the skill to physically mimic my art, I see no problem. I am not a huge fan of copyright. AI does not have the physical skill to make art. It is entirely directed by human input and programming and relies on such to generate images that correlate to a human directed request. Computers are directed by code written for them by humans and rely on humans to input data. In this instance, programmers have written a program that feeds off of physically made art and generates statistical reiterations of the data that has been entered. Learning requires concious intellect. Actual physical art is being used, however much diluted, and capitalized on without the consent of the artist making the physical effort to create it.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- luxuryballs 4y agoI use computers to do things I don’t have the innate ability to do all the time, that’s what tools are for. If someone can present that an artifact I used in a commercial product is an asset directly taken from their portfolio then I’d graciously remove it.