Holy french fries. With Google, I can get 80GB for $20/year: https://support.google.com/docs/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=39567 https://support.google.com/docs

Holy french fries. With Google, I can get 80GB for $20/year: https://support.google.com/docs/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=39567 https://support.google.com/docs/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answ... With Dropbox, 100GB would cost me $199/year. I've been with Dropbox forever (I have account #315) but man, it is tempting to snag 80GB for the price of half a tank of gas. Convenience is obviously the primary loss. But I'm a nerd. It would likely be easy to figure out some way of auto-syncing my whole music folder. My other primary usage for Dropbox (and incidentally the motivation for its inception) is as a way to transfer files to other people. There's nothing like being able to host your own .html file within your own dropbox with literally zero effort. That said, a hybrid of the two seems best -- ridiculously cheap bulk storage, combined with the convenience of Dropbox when needed.