4 ms·
So these 'copyright laundering' AIs also need to use an LLM to generate a legal defence that shows that the copied aspects were, in fact, the only way to expres
by YurgenJurgensen 4y ago
So these 'copyright laundering' AIs also need to use an LLM to generate a legal defence that shows that the copied aspects were, in fact, the only way to express the idea.
Which is a good thing, since having to read thousands of long spurious AI-generated copyright defences will quickly motivate lawyers to create laws against AI-generated legal defences.
- lanstin 4y agoI honestly think that, a parallel ML system to explain in words the decision of the deciding ML, is the only way we will get explainable ML. That is somewhat analogous to how humans decide. Our brain runs over data and various potential outcomes and maybe reasoning and then decides. A bit later it generates a post-how explanation of said decision.I think we all have experienced ourselves and others having a totally wrong explanation about decisions but it is some how more satisfying than “a gut feel” or “because I said so”.