Unless there are imitation Kincades in the training set labeled with the name Kincade, I would expect the model to fail to produce anything relevant. It’s a st

Unless there are imitation Kincades in the training set labeled with the name Kincade, I would expect the model to fail to produce anything relevant. It’s a strange situation. Certainly a human painter is free to study copywritten works closely and then produce art in the style of the other artist, provided the resulting work is “in the style of” but does not copy a specific painting. So why is a human SD-artist not allowed to do the same with their preferred tool? Perhaps because we can draw a causal line (a very fuzzy one) between the original and the knock off? But wait… in the human painter case the same fuzzy line exists, it’s just through wet-ware not hardware. Perhaps passing first into a LLM trained to generate good prompts but never output specific artists’ names could get close? Has someone tried this?